Approval hearings( children & protected parties): overview, CPR and notes from hearing

Approval hearings exist to ensure that any settlement reached on behalf of a protected party (including adults lacking capacity or children) is genuinely in their best interests. The court acts as a safeguard because these individuals cannot make binding litigation decisions on their own.

1. Who is a Protected Party?

A protected party is someone who, due to age or mental capacity, cannot conduct litigation themselves. Litigation must be conducted by a litigation friend. Commonly this includes:

  • Children under 18

  • Adults lacking capacity under the Mental Capacity Act 2005

2. Why Court Approval Is Required

A settlement is not binding unless the court approves it. This prevents unfair, premature, or inappropriate settlements. The court examines:

  • Whether the settlement sufficiently compensates for injuries/losses

  • Whether funds are adequately protected (e.g., Court Funds Office or deputy/trust)

  • Whether costs and deductions, including legal fees, are reasonable

  • Overall fairness and long‑term welfare of the claimant

3. Steps in an Approval Hearing Process

(a) Application to Court

The claimant’s solicitor files the application, which must include:

  • Medical evidence

  • Financial assessments

  • A barrister’s opinion on the settlement’s suitability

  • Draft orders and schedules of loss for scrutiny

(b) Hearing Itself

At the hearing:

  • The judge reviews whether the terms are in the claimant’s best interests

  • The litigation friend confirms approval of the settlement

  • Judge may ask questions about prognosis, capacity, and how damages will be managed

  • The judge may approve, request more information, or decline the settlement
    In children’s cases the child may attend, but attendance is not always required.

(c) Judicial Decision

The judge either:

  • Approves the settlement

  • Requests further evidence/clarification

  • Directs renegotiation of certain elements

4. Management of Settlement Funds

Post‑approval, the court determines how funds are held or invested.

  • For protected adults, this may involve a Court‑appointed deputy

  • For children, funds are generally placed with the Court Funds Office until age 18

Relevant CPR Provisions (Part 21)

Approval hearings are governed by CPR Part 21 – Children and Protected Parties.

1. Requirement for a Litigation Friend – CPR 21.2

A protected party must have a litigation friend. A child must also have one unless the court orders otherwise. No steps in proceedings (beyond issuing/serving) may be taken until a litigation friend is appointed.

2. Compromise or Settlement – CPR 21.10

This is the core rule governing approval hearings. It states:

  • No settlement, compromise, or payment in a claim by, on behalf of, or against a child or protected party is valid without the court’s approval.

  • Approval applications must follow the Part 8 procedure.

  • The application must include:

    • A draft consent order

    • Details of liability

    • Age/occupation of the child or protected party

    • Confirmation that the litigation friend approves the settlement

    • Medical, financial, and other expert evidence

    • A specialist barrister’s legal opinion on merits (in almost all cases)

3. Control of Money – CPR 21.11

Court controls how funds are invested or managed on behalf of the child/protected party.

4. Costs – CPR 21.12

The court also reviews and approves the litigation friend's costs and any expenses.

Notes from a recent personal injury AH at MCJC, courtroom 38, His Honour Judge Malek.

The Court reviewed the settlement’s suitability for a protected party (claimant with lifelong epilepsy).

  • Consideration was given to Article 8 and 10 balancing for anonymity — common in significant‑value protected‑party claims.

  • Judge ensured there was appropriate provision for a financial deputy, consistent with CPR 21’s control‑of‑funds framework.

  • The settlement could only become valid once formally approved, as CPR 21.10 requires.

Previous
Previous

Inside a Fast-Track RTA Hearing: Key Issues in Credit Hire, Storage, Recovery and Injury Evidence

Next
Next

Laurie Legal: a promise to make legal support more accessible